What is an Examination for Discovery and can I be forced to attend one?

If you bring an action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia you must make yourself available for an examination for discovery (an “XFD”). An XFD is an oral examination under oath. Furthermore, a written record is made of everything you say at an XFD. This means that anything you say can be used against you in later proceedings, which can lead to serious liability issues. For example, if you say one thing at an XFD and then say another thing at a trial, the judge can use this against you to make negative inferences about your credibility as a whole.

The procedure of an XFD in an ICBC case usually involves a lawyer from ICBC spending 2 or more (it can be a lot longer for catastrophic injuries) asking the plaintiff questions. A wide variety of subjects are fair game when making a claim for personal injury. This can include questions about your medical history and personal life.

There are, however, limitations to what can be discussed at an examination for discovery. For example irrelevant and privileged questions are not fair game. A competent lawyer will be able to advise you on what your should and should not be answering. They will also be able to attend the XFD with you and stop the other lawyer from asking inappropriate questions. The lawyer for the other party will be sitting across the table from you asking many questions, and they may not be nice about it.

The above shows how important it is to get proper legal advice before an XFD. A lawyer will, unfortunately, not be able to help you answer any questions at an XFD. They can, however, give you advice and properly prepare you beforehand. An XFD is often a key point in a personal injury lawsuit. It is an opportunity for the opposing parties to meat each other and determine the strength of their case as a whole. This is especially important for personal injury cases, which often hinge on the credibility of the plaintiff, as many injuries, such as soft-tissue injuries, cannot always be objectively observed.

Vermont_Lawyer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s